Crying tears of joy after miraculously finding my misplaced phone. |
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
All I want for Christmas is... extra credit
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Passing the "human" test
Each Thursday, I comment on two blogs of
my peers. And each Thursday, I struggle to “prove [I’m] not a robot,” as Blogger
directs, to publish my comments. The website requires each user to type a
sequence of numbers and letters illustrated ambiguously in a picture. Although
this seems an easy task, it takes me two or three attempts to decode the
annoyingly deceptive sequence. In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby,
it takes the characters more than typing a jumbled code to prove their human
capabilities. Determining whether or not a character possesses the redeeming
qualities to be considered a human becomes the conflict. Throughout the novel,
a showcase of the seemingly perfect lives of New York’s elite social class, few
characters prove themselves as living, breathing and compassionate human
beings. Fitzgerald portrays the remainder of the characters as insensitive,
paralleling them to those blog-hacking robots that I attempt to separate myself
from every Thursday. Often, the true identity of a person becomes apparent
during or following a traumatic experience. Fitzgerald emphasizes this claim
through the reactions of the characters amidst the hit-and-run incident that
killed Myrtle. For instance, Fitzgerald portrays Nick as one of the few
characters whom the accident affected. He revealed that he had “had enough of
all of them” (142). His disapproving tone indirectly characterizes him as
compassionate, ultimately foiling him to the other characters that did not feel
guilt following Myrtle’s death. Next, he depicts Tom as sensitive through his
thoughtful act of “picking up Wilson like a doll,” to console his mistress’s
husband (141). His behavior indirectly characterizes him as caring, also
foiling him to the unaffected “non-humans.” Contrastingly, he illustrates
Gatsby and Daisy the characters who committed the crime, as more concerned
about themselves, therefore, portraying them as apathetic “robots.” Gatsby
behaved as if “Daisy’s reaction was the only thing that mattered,” indirectly
characterizing him as ignorant to the true problem: his role of accessory to
murder (143). Gatsby became more involved with personal matters instead of
dealing with the consequences of his actions. Similarly, Daisy “stood [the
accident” (143). By indirectly characterizing her as content, even after
killing a human being, Fitzgerald underscores her lack of empathy towards other
individuals. Gatsby and Daisy’s reactions to the crime they committed would not
pass my “prove you are not a robot” test.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
R.I.P. Springs
Like almost every child in America,
my life goal from age four to nine amounted to one thing: getting a dog. However,
the more I begged and pleaded, the less successful my persuasion of my parents
became. No matter how many times I Google-Imaged cute pictures of puppies and
delivered them to my mom’s desk, my attempts proved worthless. Until the
nearing of my fifth birthday, I lacked any hope. My mom hinted that my birthday
would contain a “big surprise,” so naturally my almost-five-year-old brain
anticipated nothing less than a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel with a ribbon
around his or (preferably) her neck. On September 16th, the day of
my fifth birthday, I kept my eyes on the prize. I did not want any part in
school festivities or even birthday cake. I only thought about a furry, little
puppy licking my hand for the first time. Gift time came and went and just as
we finished cleaning up, my mom brought out one last present. “But wait,” I
thought, “there is no way my puppy can breathe in that tiny box!” So I rushed
as I tore off the wrapping paper and eventually found not a dog, but a frog,
sitting idly in a miniature tank. One can imagine the level my confusion;
instead of a proud owner of a new four-legged friend, I owned a frog that could
not even leave its tank. This grand travesty came to mind upon reading the
quote on Ms. Serensky’s board today that originates from William Shakespeare,
saying, “Expectation is the root of all heartache.” The frog did not meet my
expectations, leaving me quite disheartened. I realize that Shakespeare’s quote
most likely pertains to expectations in love. However, today represents the
two-year anniversary of little Springs’ death. I grew to love my frog, Springs,
and even stopped petitioning for a dog. The incident inspired me to re-evaluate
my expectations, however, and three years later my mom shocked me with a puppy
on my eighth birthday. Shakespeare’s quote applies to the discussion of love in
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. Gatsby maintained a mystifying
persona throughout the first half of the book, however, allowed his
expectations to surpass reality when he confronted his loneliness. For five
years, he imagined his encounter with former lover, Daisy Buchanan. When the
two finally reunited though, Gatsby wonders about the “quality of his present
happiness” (95). Gatsby’s doubtful tone surfaces the implication that in the
time of the couple’s absence from each other, he became infatuated with the
memory of Daisy that did not coincide with Daisy’s current state of mind.
Shakespeare reaches out to the overly hopeful people to encourage them to
re-evaluate their expectations to avoid feeling dejected of reality.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)