Throughout the
novel Crooked Letter, Crooked Letter, the author Tom Franklin
illustrates a person who became the product of incessant ostracism. This
character, Larry Ott, endured judgment and exclusion from the community of
Chabot, Mississippi. Marla, an infamous employee at the town’s diner, The Hub,
explains that the “whole county thinks he’s a kidnaper or rapist or murderer or
all three” (94). Franklin uses this hyperbole to explicate the negative
reputation associated with Larry, and more importantly, to show how few people
genuinely tolerate him without judgment. However, despite the lack of sympathy
for Larry, Silas Jones, the town’s sheriff and old friend of Larry’s,
constantly defends him and rewards him with benefit of the doubt. Besides
Silas’s reservations when it comes to communicating with Larry, he remains
unbiased when Larry’s innocence becomes questioned. Silas’s understanding
attitude towards the town’s outcast leads me to respect him more as a person. I
appreciate his will to believe the best in someone until they can be proven
guilty. For example, when Larry’s innocence becomes doubted following the
disappearance of a local girl when he was a young boy and when history repeated
itself after about 30 years, Silas remains consistent in Larry’s defense saying,
“I just don’t think he’s got it in him” (141). Personally, I judge Silas as
“right” morally, putting discernment aside and instead valuing what he knows as
the truth. Those who judge Larry and even those who support him do not know entirely
what happened between him and the girl who disappeared in his past, Cindy
Walker. But unlike the townspeople, Silas does not jump to conclusions about
Larry. Franklin writes with dramatic irony, which allows his readers to hold
knowledge that the townspeople do not have. With this writing style, the
readers gain a perspective in which they also will want to stand up for Larry’s
innocence, paralleling Silas’s attitude. Although it would become expected for
Silas to shun Larry similar to the rest of the town due to their shared past,
he remains professional. Growing up, Silas and Larry became fast friends
despite their demographic differences, until their friendship came to an abrupt
end as a result of Larry’s drunk and malicious father, Carl Ott. After the physical
fight they were forced into by Carl, emotional evidence lingered with Silas for
years to come. However, he did not allow these memories and past assumptions to
control his beliefs of Larry. Moreover, I, like Franklin, admire Silas’s
open-mindedness regarding the criticisms of Larry.
Do you think that Franklin makes Silas so open-minded about criticisms regarding Larry because he knows that the fault lies with him? I find it difficult to fully credit Silas because by the end of the novel, we know that he knows the truth about Larry's circumstance.
ReplyDeleteAlso, you need to create a creative title for your blog. Pronto!
ReplyDelete